DEVURANDOM.ORG, random bits from Deryck Hodge
  • Work
  • WWW
  • Blog
  • About

What's in my reader?

The following is my reading list direct from Google Reader

  • An Engine Fit For My Proceeding
  • Clever Zebra - Open Solutions for Virtual Enterprise
  • collapsing geography
  • Confessions of an Aca/Fan
  • Defying Classification
  • Ego Food
  • Elapsed Time
  • Electric Sheep Company
  • Gwyn’s Home
  • Holovaty.com
  • Ian Bicking: a blog
  • jacobian.org
  • JeffCroft.com: Homepage
  • Jeremy Zawodny's blog
  • Leah Culver's Stupid Blog
  • Massively
  • Matt Cutts: Gadgets, Google, and SEO
  • New World Notes
  • Official Linden Blog
  • One More Blog
  • qLab
  • Reuters/Second Life
  • robcurley.com
  • Second Life Insider
  • Shiny Life
  • Signal vs. Noise
  • Simon Willison's Weblog
  • superpixel subscripts
  • The Auburn Plainsman - A spirit that is not afraid.
  • The B-List: Latest entries
  • The EveryBlock Blog
  • Torley Lives
  • Virtual Worlds News
  • what a quiet stiff
  • whump.com | More Like This WebLog
  • why the lucky stiff
  • Wilson Miner Live / Posts

Linden Lab lowers prices, estate owners rebel - Massively

Linden Lab lowers prices, estate owners rebel - Massively

For a lot of the things SL residents get upset about, this one is much ado about nothing IMHO. The main reason for this supposed "devaluing" of property is that people have bought into the metaphor that they are indeed buying land, albeit virtual land. Ownership is a great metaphor, but in this case it's causing some harm. When you "buy" land in Second Life you are really leasing server space, so any expectation of recouping the value of said lease on "sell" is wishful thinking. Granted the SL economy has worked like this often, but I don't see any way this is sustainable.

I think you can certainly sustain a model that buys an island and divides it up into smaller pieces to sell for a profit, but this notion that land has a value that remains stable or increases the same way RL land works is just not likely. At least not with a single company maintaining the servers. I'm not sure you would want to anyway, given the dynamics of a virtual economy. For example, new hardware is always going to appear; therefore; the old server will naturally devalue. Linden Lab's move makes sense to me for these reasons. It's just a shame residents can't see past the metaphor in this one case.

Tags: second life, virtual worlds, virtual land, economics

Comments

Post a comment

Your name:

Comment:

The writing for this website is Copyright © Deryck Hodge 2003-2006 and is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Code is subject to the license included with the source.

The opinions expressed here are entirely my own, and not necessarily those of my employer.

Made with Django.